How To Choose Analog FPV Camera For FPV Drones

by Oscar

Dedicated FPV cameras provides low latency real-time video to the drone pilots when they are flying. To choose the best FPV camera for racing drones and multirotors in general, there are a few things to consider which we will discuss in this tutorial.


FPV Camera Round-up

FPV camera is one of the most important parts of the FPV setup on a quadcopter. Real-time video captured from FPV camera is sent to the pilot through a video transmitter.

It doesn’t matter what video transmitter you are going to use, the image you see is only as good as your FPV camera.

I compiled the specifications of all FPV cameras for mini quad in this spreadsheet so you can compare them more closely.

If you are looking for recommendations, here is my take on the best FPV cameras.

FPV Camera installed in a racing drone

FPV camera installed in a racing drone

Table of Content

FPV Camera Size and Weight

Larger FPV cameras tend to have a larger image sensor and able to use a larger lens for better image quality. However, which camera size you can use depends on the drone frame you are planning to put it on.

FPV camera sizes are determined by the width – the distance between the two side mounting holes. The common sizes are:

  • Standard, aka “full size” (28mm)
  • Mini (21mm)
  • Micro (19mm)
  • Nano (14mm)

A dedicated FPV camera can weigh between 4g to 20g.

There are also “AIO” (all in one) FPV cameras that has a video transmitter integrated (usually mounted on the back of the camera). They feature a small form factor and light weight, however they are usually not the best in terms of image quality and range. These are popular in micro size drones such as the Tiny Whoop, and we don’t normally use them on bigger drones.

CCD and CMOS – The Types of Imaging Sensor

CCD and CMOS are two main types of image sensors in FPV cameras, each with unique characteristics and advantages.

CCD is an older technology and used to be the go-to image sensor for FPV cameras as it performed better than CMOS at the time.

But CMOS technology has been improving really quickly and it’s now just as good as CCD if not better. Nowadays nearly all new FPV cameras use CMOS sensors and they are constantly getting better and cheaper.

Here is a summary of the pros and cons of CCD and CMOS:


  • Less jello effect in footage due to global shutter
  • Image is more “raw” and appears to be less processed. Resolution and image detail are normally lower than the best of CMOS cameras
  • Good performance at most lighting conditions, less digital noise in low light
  • Not the best but acceptable dynamic range performance and light/dark transition
  • Image usually has better contrast than CMOS
  • Cameras with CCD sensors across the board perform similarly. Unlike CMOS cameras, performance varies a lot


  • The performance and price of CMOS cameras differ vastly – the most expensive cameras are usually CMOS, and ironically the cheapest cameras are also CMOS, while CCD is usually in the mid price range
  • Generally lower in latency (with one or two exceptions)
  • Higher resolution and sharper image, the trade-off is heavier digital noise and artifacts
  • Low light / Night FPV cameras tend to use large CMOS sensors
  • More susceptible to jello due to rolling shutter
  • Usually more flexible/dynamic with camera settings

For more detail check out this post about the differences of CCD and CMOS.

There is no doubt the best CMOS cameras outperform CCD cameras these days, such as the Runcam Micro Eagle and Phoenix Oscar Edition.

Personally, I don’t think it matters which image sensor you want to choose, as long as you like how the image looks. Make sure to check reviews before buying, see how they perform in the lighting condition you tend to fly in.

Aspect Ratio

There are 2 aspect ratio to choose from in FPV cameras, 4:3 and 16:9. Aspect ratio has nothing to do with resolution, it’s just the different screen shape.

16:9 vs. 4:3

4:3 is more square and has the shape of an old CRT TV while 16:9 is longer like a modern computer monitor.

One isn’t always better than the other, it all comes down to which ratio your FPV goggles or display supports. If you have a 4:3 camera, but your goggles is 16:9, the image will appear stretched. If you have a 16:9 camera but a 4:3 display, the image will appear squashed.

Aspect ratio isn’t directly related to the peripheral view, e.g. 16:9 camera doesn’t necessarily give you a wider field of view. It actually depends on the lens and image sensor of your camera, which we will talk about later.

But it’s worth knowing that CMOS sensors have a native aspect ratio of 16:9, while that of the CCD is 4:3. Some CMOS cameras allow you to choose between 16:9 and 4:3 in the setting, but the 4:3 is achieved by chopping off the sides from a 16:9 image, and therefore you will get a smaller field of view in 4:3.

Field of View (FOV)

The field of view (FOV) of an FPV camera is determined by three things, the focal length of the lens, and the sensor size.

  • Shorter focal length => wider FOV
  • Larger sensor size => wider FOV

As mentioned previously, aspect ratio can also have an effect on FOV if the camera supports both 16:9 and 4:3. In this case, when you select 4:3 it will simply chop both sides off and you get a smaller FOV.

There is no “best” FOV, it’s entirely a personal preference, and sometimes depends on the type of environment you fly in.

To give you some idea, here is a rough estimation for a camera with 1/3″ sensor size in 4:3 aspect ratio:

Lens Focal Length Approx. FOV
1.8mm 160° – 170°
2.1mm 150° – 160°
2.3mm 140° – 150°
2.5mm 130° – 140°
2.8mm 120° – 130°
3.0mm 110° – 120°

With smaller FOV, the image is more zoomed in and you can see things more clearly. Wider FOV allows you to see more of the environment which might be preferred for proximity flying and racing.

However when the FOV gets too large, the image will appear more distorted, which is known as the “fish eye” effect. The objects in the middle will appear smaller and further away than it really is, while the edges of the image will appear curved and distorted.

I personally find 140-160 degree a good range for FPV, typically 2.1mm – 2.5mm lens for 1/3″ sensor.

This is a good example of different FOV (from narrower to wider).

Sensor Sizes

Two main sensor sizes: 1/1.8″ and 1/3″ – the former is larger while the latter is smaller.

Sensor size affects low light performance and dynamic range. It’s almost always true that a camera with larger sensor has better low light performance given the same settings. Larger sensor also offers a larger FOV given the same focal length lens.

Lens Sizes

You can replace the lens on an FPV camera to get a different FOV or image quality. FPV camera lenses are different in two main things: focal length and thread size.

I have an article just about FPV camera lenses if you want to know more.

Full size cameras normally have lenses with 12mm diameter threads you can screw into the housing. We call this M12 lenses.

Smaller lenses are also used in some cameras in order to make it smaller and lighter. These lenses normally have 8mm diameter threads – the M8 lenses.

M12 lenses are bigger and heavier. They are normally used in Mini and Standard size cameras. They let more light in, thus the image quality is usually better than M8 lenses. M8 lenses are very compact and mostly used in Micro and Nano cameras.

Wide Dynamic Range (WDR)

Wide Dynamic Range (WDR) is a technology that aims to improve image detail under extreme lighting conditions where both bright and dark areas are present in the same frame.

WDR - Wide Dynamic Range of an FPV Camera

WDR – Wide Dynamic Range of an FPV Camera

As you can see the image on the left it’s under exposed, you can see the sun and clouds very well, but the tree and bushes are all dark. On the right we have an image that is slightly over exposed, the trees are all visible now but the sky is blown out. The image in the middle represents the best wide dynamic rangeof the three images, you can see the clouds and the trees at the same time.

Once you understand the concept you will begin to appreciate the importance of WDR capability in FPV cameras because it helps you see better when flying. Most FPV cameras have some degree of WDR, but the WDR performance can vary.

Low Light Capability

If you plan to fly indoor, at sunset/dawn, or even at night, then you have to find out about the low light performance of an FPV camera. Some are designed more specifically for low light than others.

Here is a low light comparison of some popular FPV cameras I did recently.

Low light capability of an FPV camera is measured in LUX. The lower it goes the better it is for low light. For example, the Runcam Swift 2 has a minimum LUX value of 0.01, while that of the Runcam Eagle 2 is 0.0001, you know the Eagle 2 is going to be better at low light than the Swift 2.

Cameras with bigger imaging sensor also normally perform better in low light as more light enters the sensor.

Most FPV cameras come with day/night mode. It enables to the camera to output either color and black and white images based on user’s selection, or lighting condition. “Night mode” makes use of near-IR light to deliver black and white images, allows you to see better in low light.

NTSC and PAL – Video Encoding Format

Does it matter which one to use? It does and it doesn’t.

The main difference between NTSC and PAL is in resolution and frame rate. PAL offers slightly better resolution, while NTSC allows higher frame rate. If you want to have better picture, go with PAL. But if you want more fluid footage, NTSC does a better job.

  • PAL: 720 x 576 @ 25fps
  • NTSC: 720 x 480 @ 30fps

For a more detail comparison, check out this post.

Conventionally, NTSC is used in North America, Japan and South Korea while PAL is used in most of Europe, Australia and large parts of Africa and Asia. It might be a good idea to stick with the standard in your country. But it really doesn’t matter nowadays, because both video formats are supported by all FPV equipment.

Note that you have to choose which format your camera is using in Betaflight OSD in order to have the text displayed correctly.

TVL – FPV Camera Resolution

TVL (TV Lines) is what manufacturers use to measure analogue FPV camera resolution.

The number is based on how many alternating black and white lines can be displayed in the image horizontally. A 600TVL camera means it can display 300 black lines and 300 white lines alternately in one frame. The more TV lines, the better definition image you can get out of the camera. Commonly seen FPV cameras TVL are 600, 700, 800 and 1200.

However higher TVL doesn’t always give you better image due to the limitation of analog 5.8Ghz video transmission, as well as your monitor or FPV goggles. For example, 1200TVL is not going to be twice as sharp comparing to 600TVL in an analogue FPV system.

There is no easy way to verify the TVL spec claimed by manufacturers. So don’t be overly concerned about this number when buying an FPV camera, and base your decision on the actual image quality.


It takes time for the FPV camera to capture and process the image before sending it to the video transmitter. The delay varies from camera to camera depends on its hardware as well as software.

Latency can be a deciding factor if you are into drone racing or high speed flying. The lower the latency, the more quickly the pilot can react.

Imagine if you are flying at 100Km/h, a delay of 50ms (0.05s) means you quad will travel 1.4m before you can react on the sticks, which could mean the difference if you hit or miss the obstacle.

Latency is not something printed on the specifications, so I try my best to test as many cameras as I can, and provide this info to the community: FPV Camera Latency Testing.

Camera Settings

You can access the camera menu and settings using a controller that comes with the camera.

Thanks to the effort by flight controller software developers, we can now even do this from our radio transmitter by hooking up your camera to the flight controller. This means you can change your camera settings anywhere without carrying a controller with you.

Here is the tutorial how to set up camera control via OSD pin.

Can I use HD cameras as FPV camera?

Those HD FPV videos you see on Youtube are captured using HD action cameras like the GoPro or Runcam 3, which is an additional camera pilots put on their multirotors.

Some of these HD cameras provide “video out” capability, and you can hook up to a video transmitter for FPV. But the latency is normally too high for FPV flying (typically over 100ms). You will probably crash before you can even see it.

Therefore I always use a dedicated FPV camera alongside with a HD recording camera. It’s also important that you don’t put the FPV camera on a gimbal, so it doesn’t mess up your orientation.

Recording Flight Footage

DVR (digital video recorder) is used to record footage off FPV cameras. There are two ways to do it.

Most FPV goggles, like the Fatshark’s and Skyzone’s, have built-in DVR that records footage from the video receiver, i.e. whatever you see on the screen can be recorded. But that also includes all the the signal break-up you get during flight.

The other way is to place a DVR inside the quadcopter, and connect it directly to the FPV camera. I call this “onboard DVR”. This way you can record footage without any interference, and image quality tend to be better as there is no quality loss from passing the 5.8GHz link.

But either way the footage is not going to be as good as an HD camera like the GoPro, but it’s cheaper and lighter to do. There are now light weight HD cameras that can record 1080p, even up to 4K videos, while being used as a low latency FPV camera, like the Runcam Split.

“On Screen Display” (OSD)

This is a bit off topic, but i am sure there are people wondering how to display all those useful flight information on the screen. Basically, an OSD (on screen display) is a separate feature built into some flight controller, that overlays text/data onto your camera footage.

Do not be confused with the setting menu in FPV cameras, which some manufacturers refer to as “OSD” as well in the product page. FPV camera setting menu is also technically “OSD”, because it’s text that pops up on the screen, but that’s not the term we would normally use.

How to Connect FPV Camera?

The wiring of the FPV camera in your drone depends on the application and what components you have.

In the simplest and most basic form, an FPV camera has three wires you have to connect: video signal, voltage input and ground.

You can connect the FPV camera directly to a VTX, signal to signal, and you should get an image on your FPV goggles (with a working video receiver, on the same channel). Make sure you also connect the ground on both FPV camera and VTX together for this to work properly if you are powering them from different sources.

Most FPV cameras these days support wide range of input voltage, e.g. 5V to 36V. This allows you to power them either from a regulated power source or directly from a LiPo battery (2S-8S).

Here are some good practices on how to connect your FPV setup to get cleaner video.

The most common way to wire an FPV camera is probably via the flight controller if it has a built-in OSD chip. There should be a video input (Vin/CamS/Vi) on the FC to connect the camera signal to, and a video output on the FC to connect to the VTX.

There might be other optional connections depend on the camera features, for example:

  • TX and RX (UART) – for connecting to the FC so you can change camera settings with your radio
  • OSD or Menu – for plugging in the joystick for changing camera settings
  • VBAT or VSEN – for monitoring battery voltage

Built-in Microphone

Drone motors make a lot of noise, but some people actually prefer flying FPV and listing to motor noise and feel that it gives a greater sense of being “connected” to the aircraft. Like a professional auto racer listening to their vehicle’s engine revs. If to you, all you can hear is the annoying sound of the motors and rushing air, you can just leave the audio wire disconnected. It’s a personal preference.

Some FPV cameras has built-in mic, you can then hook it up to your VTX and transmit audio back to your FPV goggles.

If you don’t need to hear beeper / motors from your model while flying, then it’s not necessary having a microphone onboard.

Video Switcher

If you are running multiple cameras on your quadcopter, you can consider using a video switcher to switch between video feeds. This allows you to see videos from different angle if you are mounting these cameras in different places in the aircraft.

There are a couple of options I tested:

You made it!

I hope this tutorial was useful and helped you choose your next FPV camera. Don’t hesitate to leave me comments or questions. Happy flying!

Edit History

  • Dec 2014 – Article created
  • Nov 2016 – Updated info about CMOS vs. CCD, Added info about OSD and camera size
  • May 2018 – Added info about camera control
  • Nov 2018 – Added info about low light capability
  • Mar 2019 – Added a little history about camera development between 2013-2016
  • Oct 2019 – Updated info regarding FOV, lens sizes, sensor sizes, CCD/CMOS, Built-in Mic, DVR, and connection

Leave a Comment

By using this form, you agree with the storage and handling of your data by this website. Note that all comments are held for moderation before appearing.


Dan Shewell 27th September 2022 - 4:56 pm

Very good article. Thanks

Paul 16th September 2021 - 1:35 am

What do you use to receive and view the video?

MrNams 26th October 2020 - 6:34 am

Can we use DJI Osmo Action Camera as FPV, (connect audio video transmitter to camera)? so that I can take 4K videos for aerial shooting as well as I use it as FPV.

I am ok with latency, when I use DJI Osmo Action camera as FPV.

I want to connect my “TS832 48Ch 5.8G 600mW Wireless Audio/Video Transmitter for FPV RC” to DJI Osmo Action Camera.

Please help!.

skywinder 23rd August 2019 - 12:44 pm

How about FX900TW and the FX805 with OSD?
I found them there. It would be nice to add them as well to review for nano size!

kenstogie 5th March 2019 - 4:44 pm

Oscarm,, thanks for the write up…. there are so many options I am dizzy….

Oscar 11th March 2019 - 4:14 pm

Just check my recommended camera list :) (search for best fpv camera oscar)

Gary Rushton 5th February 2019 - 11:56 pm

Thanks for taking the time to provide the information.

I have just installed the AIO by the looks of the picture in a rc digger. Chosen because of size.
Works ok but I would be interested in a lens that deals with short distance with clarity, ie it’s fitted in the cab and the focus is on the bucket.
Would you have any suggestions?
Thanks in advance

J W 27th January 2019 - 11:00 pm

Hello Oscar,
Good articles, thanks.
But I’m looking for a VERY SLIM camera with best digital, res., clarity, not for a drone,
that has the lowest (air) aerodynamic drag,
for an RC airplane, to be mounted on it’s fuselage side,
or the most forward top / bottom portion of it’s wing.
But, also (camera) mounted on a servo controlled vertical gimble,
for (as close to) a zero degree up and to 180 degrees down (view) travel,
the aircraft will do the 360 degrees plus horizontal (yaw) view.
This is for personal fun only.
I’m a senior RC pilot, life AMA member with safety in mind.
I’ve done basic searches for the above items with no results.
Thank you for any comments.
Sincerely – JW

Newb 5th January 2019 - 4:40 am

Thank you for not assuming everyone knows what all these acronyms mean :)
Very helpful article.

john raulerson 20th November 2018 - 12:09 am

I need a first person view camera for my drone which is three feet long with a three feet wingspan. The plane weighs less than 15 pounds.

Alec 24th May 2018 - 6:30 pm

Is there any development to a high FPS live feed? Competitive gamers such as myself do indeed benefit greatly from 144hz monitors, so I think it will benefit the FPV community as well. Current FPV cameras are only a max of 30 FPS, which is quite slow if you ask me.

erpoyo 18th March 2018 - 12:17 pm

Great information!
I do actually have a questions, so I got myself a 1000TVL camera

The image is just great but not sure if that could be considered HD. It is actually 1000 Lines right?
The goggles I have do not support HD, they are actually 600×400 so as you mention on the article, I am loosing some quality there but just got it in case someday I want to upgrade the goggles.

Also the camera has a screw there so though I could remove the lens but have not been able to do so.. any idea on how to do it?

Oscar 22nd March 2018 - 6:50 pm

TVL is not pixels.

Tim 13th February 2018 - 8:38 pm

Excellent info thanks, as this is not a recent article do you have a more up to date one? Keen to see if there are any better newer options, I am looking to upgrade my Wizard X220S with 800TVL to something with a better picture, I like the sound of the Predator in this article.

Thanks again for your helpful info,

Oscar 6th March 2018 - 4:46 pm

The considerations for FPV camera haven’t changed much, so the info in this post is still very relevant.
We recently updated our recommendation for FPV cameras:

Sudarshan 26th November 2017 - 3:22 pm

Sir for On Screen Display can we connect the smart phone to video reciever?
If so how can we connect it?

Lon Ratley 1st May 2017 - 2:23 am

Thanks for the tutorial. We are looking for a relatively simple system with long dwell time for monitoring our hunting preserves to preclude poaching. We need real live time feedback and some sort of system that will monitor a wide field of view (largest ground area with reasonable resolution). Any suggestions?



tyekim1 9th February 2017 - 12:23 am

Thanks Oscar…..for everything!

Rettro 26th January 2017 - 6:28 pm

A current or near future technical question from a serious amateur still photographer: Are there quadcopter cameras with large image sensors (e.g. “full size” Nikon D5 is 35.9 mm X 23.9 mm)? Are there interchangeable lens or mechanical zoom, not digital zoom? Explanation of the question: The perspective of the quadcopter offers a practical perspective for “art” still shots that otherwise only could be achieved by shooting from full sized helicopter. By being able to more narrowly control the depth of field…I.e. make it more shallow…and be able to capture large image files…i.e. raw files in the 24 mb range, large artistic images would be possible. For example, a shot of a ship at sea needs a deep depth of field but a shot from about 50 ft of a raptor feeding its young in the nest needs only about 2-3 ft in focus. Too great a depth of field in that setting distracts the eye from the subject. You want only an out of focus background that supports but not distracts from the story you are trying to tell with the image.

Johnathan hoehaver 31st December 2016 - 3:55 am

Thank you for this, I have been struggling with questions towards fpv and it’s setup for months now, finally building my second 250quad after losing my first in the woods (still). And now it’s on to finally, ohhh finally, fpv. This blog was really, very well articulated and touched on every topic I had questioned about. You’re the man.

In conclusion, I’ve decided on 600tv , probably that Foxeer HS1177 you mentioned, I have it on paste lol my only other question would be… for the transmitter, is 600mw the obvious choice, over 200mw? Also.. is 1.??ghz better then 5.8ghz?

Ben Portman 2nd October 2016 - 12:44 am

Hi Oscar, have recently dragged out the old fossils stuff frame and rebuilt it, I’m using a runcam 2 for both recording and video (1080P @ 60fps) I’m not getting noticeable lag for my flying style (cruising about and mostly shaking alot whilst flying!)
It maybe worth mentioning that this is an option now with runcam 2.1 firmware. I’ve connected the video lead to a Vtx, and am running the camera directly off the lipo with the battery out. There’s also a genius mod here; where they guy has used the empty battery space to fit a vtx in the runcam……If you’re not racing, this is adequate and saves space and weight.

Bryan 7th July 2016 - 1:08 am

Hello. Under the section on FOV I think you have a mistake – lenses that come with IR filters make for better daytime visibility, but drastically reduce nighttime visibility. Most cameras have an IR filter. If the camera does not have an IR Filter, you can sometimes see really well at dusk, etc, but risk having “whiteout” during the day.

Jim Eastep 3rd July 2016 - 12:28 pm

Your information is always very clear and objective.
There are two issues I would like to see you discuss:
1) Can you discussion the intracacies of FPV latency?
2) If a camera has a particular actual resolution in pixels (WxH), can we expect this resolution to be accurately conveyed to the 5.8ghz receivers and DVRs? If not, how do we tell what we are actually getting?

ninh bui 25th April 2016 - 8:04 pm

I bought this Boscam All In One 7″ Inch FPV Monitor w/ 5.8ghz Receiver and Built-In Battery and Boscam TS832 32Ch 5.8Ghz 600mw Wireless Audio/Video Transmitter for FPV RC CN143 for my Fuav seraphi copter with the Firefly camera came with the copter but i not be able to connect one to another. I change every combination of dip switch seem not work…any one out there can help me ion this. i bought this two from ebay but have tuff time to reach them for help can not return neither

Ivan 2nd March 2016 - 3:08 pm

There is no info of how to find correct aspect ratio camera and googles.
I have spent a lot of time to find real camera with 16:9 aspect ratio which corresponds to my FPV googles.
I don’t understand why most of the cameras are 4:3 aspect ratio when most of the TV, Monitors, googles are 16:9.
Even GoPro outputs 4:3 live video and adds black bars up and down which makes impossible to use with any of 16:9 TV.

digler 9th March 2016 - 10:00 am

Hi Ivan. The main reason you can’t get 16.9 is because analogue video is 4.3 -eg 720×576 (pal) You can “fake” 16.9 by using a camera with anamorphic pixel aspect ratio. so the end result will look great on a 16.9 screen. i would love to use one of these but haven’t seen any around. I only know about anamorphic because i do video production and thats how we got wide screen before HD came along. eg by using a mini-dv camera with the anamorphic setting – when we used this feature the picture would be squeezed/narrow (stretched in a vertical fashion) when viewing through a 4.3 screen on our cameras. we’d fix it during editing wr the image would be stretched back to normal, resulting in a widescreen image. hope this makes sense! (ps: i think buzzhobbies had a camera that did widescreen)

Anushka De Silva 15th November 2015 - 12:26 pm

Hi Oscar

Thank you very much for this post It really helped thanks.

john sutton 6th November 2015 - 4:01 pm

Hi Oscar
I have viewed the Inspires digital view through Headplay. It was awesome.
I want to have that super digital clarity for my 250 racer.
So I need a lightweight video transmitter (200 meters is minimum but more is better ) & receiver with no lag and a small high res. digital camera.
I understand GoPro has lag which I do not wish to tolerate.
Can I have your advice please .
Please respond to my email address with a copy of your response when you have time.

geroge 5th June 2016 - 1:33 pm

the reason we fly analogue is because it is tolerant of interference. hd signal is either all or nothing. when signal is weak, you get no image. i don’t know about you, but when signal is weak (ie. due to lots of trees and interference) i’d rather get a really garbled image (and still be able to just barely make out enough to fly out of the woods) than see no image at all (and most definitely crash due to that same interference).

Bill 29th October 2015 - 6:49 pm

Hey thank you for the information. I just wanted to make a quick note. When you said “Some lenses can even improve the camera light sensitivity, and some come with infrared filter which enhance the ability at night.” I think you meant to say that some come “without” the filter which enhance night visibility.

Prog4j 12th October 2015 - 10:32 pm

Hi Oscar
Thanks for the post, it’s very helpful.

I have a questions regarding FPV cameras and transmitters.
You say FPV cameras has at least 3 wires (positive voltage, ground and video). So, is it possible to connect any kind of FPV camera (CCD/CMOS) to any transmitter?

I have a TX5803 transmitter and a DEVO F7 with RX corresponding video receiver (working with an iLook camera), and I want to re-use this kit (TX/RX) for a 250 racing drone by connecting a dedicated FPV camera.


varkokonyi 29th January 2016 - 4:52 pm

Hi Prog4j

It is possible. Any kind of camera can be connected to any kind of transmitter.

Andy 20th May 2015 - 6:00 pm

Were the pictures at Hollywood beach taken with a quadcopter?
Nice place to take pics with one.

bill 24th December 2015 - 5:28 am

that was most definitely hollywood beach. My grandmother has a house about 3/4 of a mile from there… i go down every winter to get away from the NJ weather

me 2nd April 2015 - 9:04 am

Hey , just a minor point about TVL , it’s actually vertical lines displayed which is equivalent to “horizontal” resolution. The vertical resolution is fixed in the PAL / NTSC analog standard and can’t be changed. TVL is not connected in any way to 576p and 1080i or whatever which is also vertical resolution ( also called lines).
That means if you have 600 TVL you might have higher horizontal resolution but the same vertical resolution.
wikipedia has an (small) article on “tv lines”

tombo9999 25th March 2015 - 5:54 pm

…”most are made into a square shape of length 25mm”…
Sorry, but i can find only 32×32 or 38×38, can you help me?

Thanks, Luca

Oscar 27th March 2015 - 9:55 am

Hi Luca, sorry i meant 32 and 38, not 25. I have updated the post now.
but you can find smaller camera, try searching for Sony 600TVL Mini.

tombo9999 31st March 2015 - 10:54 pm

What about this one?

Thanks for your reply :)

Oscar 1st April 2015 - 3:19 pm

yes, looks good!

MarcoZ 6th March 2015 - 2:55 pm

Great …thanks for this article!

Louisiana Jeff 6th February 2015 - 10:18 pm

Nice article, very helpful. There is so much more to this hobby than “grab & go fly” and you lay it out in an easy to read and understand form. It seems every article I read leads me to 2 or 3 more I am going to need to read, I like how you refer to the more detailed stuff but break it down to beginner/advanced.

Oscar 7th February 2015 - 9:39 pm

Thanks for the kind words my friend :)

Brice 29th March 2015 - 12:12 am

Hi Oscar ,Have you tested the camera yet? love to know results

Oscar 29th March 2015 - 12:28 pm

sorry what camera?

P-J 7th January 2015 - 9:49 pm

Was about to buy a new Sony 800TVL camera but luckily I found a video on Youtube where they found out about the excessive lag compared to the Sony 600TVL PZ0420. Anyone know of a new generation camera with low lag or comparable to the Sony 600TVL PZ0420.

Oscar 8th January 2015 - 12:02 am

There are mix review on this one. quite a few people say there is no noticeable delay. I am getting one of this camera so will test it out myself :)

Dj_Garfield 30th December 2014 - 12:18 pm

After this post , if anyone ask “what is FPV ?” , you can show him the exit door :)

Oscar 31st December 2014 - 5:20 pm

ha, i will show him google :D

Munim 12th September 2015 - 1:33 am

Hi Oscar ..this is a very fine article on selection of a camera..i need a suggestion from you .i am designing a vision added inertial nevigation for quadcopter which cmos camera would you prefer me for this application.