Remember Runcam announced partnership with DJI a few months ago, to release DJI FPV compatible hardware? Well, they are finally here! The first VTX is the Runcam Link Air Unit, and two new cameras, Runcam Phoenix HD and PhoenixHD Nano.
Some of the links on this page are affiliate links. I receive a commission (at no extra cost to you) if you make a purchase after clicking on one of these affiliate links. This helps support the free content for the community on this website. Please read our Affiliate Link Policy for more information.
The Runcam Link Air Unit is IDENTICAL to the Caddx Vista, basically the same thing just under different brand. You can see my review of the Vista for more info.
It’s also compatible with Caddx Nebula Nano and Polar, the original DJI camera. All are plug and play. Check out this tutorial on how to replace ribbon cables and cameras.
Power: 7.4-26.4 V@ 4-9W
Dimensions: 29×29×13 mm
Weight: 19.5 g
It’s currently sold with Runcam’s own camera, the Phoenix HD as a bundle.
Runcam Phoenix HD FPV Camera
The new Runcam Phoenix HD is designed for the DJI FPV system. It’s compatible with Runcam Link, Caddx Vista and DJI Air Unit.
Image Sensor: 1/2”
Resolution: 1280*720@60fps
Field of view (FOV): 157°
Cable Length: 120 mm
Dimensions: L19mm*W19mm*H23.5mm
Weight: 7.5g
Just like the previous MIPI, and Caddx’s Polar, The Phoenix only supports 720p 60FPS
Left: Runcam Phoenix HD; Right: Caddx Polar
Back of the PCB:
Left: Runcam Phoenix HD; Right: Caddx Polar
Runcam PhoenixHD Nano FPV Camera
The Phoenix HD Nano is just a smaller version of the Phoenix HD. The lens is also smaller.
Dimension: 14x16mm
Weight: 4.5g
The back of the PCB.
Image Quality
Image quality is very similar between the full size and nano Phoenix HD FPV camera. Compared to the Caddx Polar, the image is brighter, the image colour is more vivid and has a warmer tone.
The Nano has a smaller lens, that’s probably why sharpness is less than the Phoenix HD. But the difference is negligible and only noticeable when you really zoom in.
Low Light
As a low light camera for the DJI FPV system, the Caddx Polar is probably still the best in my opinion.
If the Polar gets a 10/10, then I’d give the Runcam Phoenix HD an 8. The main difference between these two is the noise level in the dark, the Polar’s image appears to be considerably more crispy. But if you don’t fly at night, then it’s not really a huge problem.
With that said, the Phoenix HD is still a better cam than the original DJI camera and Nebula Nano for low light.
Hello Oscar. There were any video footage of this nano sized camera. So I have ordered it just depending on your review. And after the order it seems like runcam removed it from their website. Do you know what happened ? Why there is no footage available at the moment?
We use cookies on our website to give you the most relevant experience by remembering your preferences and repeat visits. By clicking “Accept”, you consent to the use of ALL the cookies.
This website uses cookies to improve your experience while you navigate through the website. Out of these, the cookies that are categorized as necessary are stored on your browser as they are essential for the working of basic functionalities of the website. We also use third-party cookies that help us analyze and understand how you use this website. These cookies will be stored in your browser only with your consent. You also have the option to opt-out of these cookies. But opting out of some of these cookies may affect your browsing experience.
Necessary cookies are absolutely essential for the website to function properly. These cookies ensure basic functionalities and security features of the website, anonymously.
Cookie
Duration
Description
cookielawinfo-checkbox-analytics
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Analytics".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-functional
11 months
The cookie is set by GDPR cookie consent to record the user consent for the cookies in the category "Functional".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-necessary
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookies is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Necessary".
cookielawinfo-checkbox-others
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Other.
cookielawinfo-checkbox-performance
11 months
This cookie is set by GDPR Cookie Consent plugin. The cookie is used to store the user consent for the cookies in the category "Performance".
viewed_cookie_policy
11 months
The cookie is set by the GDPR Cookie Consent plugin and is used to store whether or not user has consented to the use of cookies. It does not store any personal data.
Functional cookies help to perform certain functionalities like sharing the content of the website on social media platforms, collect feedbacks, and other third-party features.
Performance cookies are used to understand and analyze the key performance indexes of the website which helps in delivering a better user experience for the visitors.
Analytical cookies are used to understand how visitors interact with the website. These cookies help provide information on metrics the number of visitors, bounce rate, traffic source, etc.
Advertisement cookies are used to provide visitors with relevant ads and marketing campaigns. These cookies track visitors across websites and collect information to provide customized ads.
6 comments
Does it work with the DJI v1 Goggles?
Yes
Can the runcam air unit onboard recording in 1080/60 FPS with other camera like nebula pro?
Yes it can. It’s basically the exact same air unit as the DJI one, just rebranded.
Hello Oscar. There were any video footage of this nano sized camera. So I have ordered it just depending on your review. And after the order it seems like runcam removed it from their website. Do you know what happened ? Why there is no footage available at the moment?
they look identical to the foxeer apollo
andrew newton showed them
just a different case
and probably image tuning