New Frsky Air Protocol – ACCESS

If you are a long time Frsky user, you probably recognize the word “ACCST” printed at the bottom left of the Taranis display. ACCST is a TX protocol and it will be soon be replaced by a new protocol – ACCESS.

What is ACCESS Protocol?

ACCESS stands for Advanced Communication Control, Elevated Spread Spectrum. It’s the RF protocol that carries the signal from the radio to the receiver, what I would normally call the air protocol or TX protocol.

The predecessor of ACCESS is ACCST, which has been around for over 10 years. You can find the ACCST label at the bottom left of Taranis X9D+ display.

I will discuss the new features and performance improvements that ACCESS will bring to the table.

Better Performance

Performance improvements from ACCESS include:

  • Lower latency and higher baud rate
  • Supports Up to 24 full range channels

However receiver protocols such as SBUS and FPort can only handle 16 channels, so I am not sure if there will be changes to the receiver protocols as well, or it requires multiple receivers to support the remaining eight extra channels.

Just like SBUS, using higher number of channels will increase latency just like SBUS. Currently with SBUS, we prefer to use 8 channels instead of 16 for the lower latency. We don’t normally need that many channels for flying FPV quadcopters anyway, so 24 channels isn’t really necessary. But the lower latency will certainly be appealing.

Wireless Binding and Firmware Updating

ACCESS allows you to bind and flash new receiver firmware wirelessly.

Once you register a receiver with the radio, you can bind it wirelessly without touching the receiver ever again (or press the bind button). Even after updating the receiver firmware. How is how to bind/register an ACCESS receiver.

I found this to be one of the most exciting new features. TBS has been doing this on the Crossfire for years and I am glad Frsky is finally catching up! Frankly, currently flashing new receiver firmware to Frsky receivers via smartport isn’t the most user friendly, hopefully the wireless method would make it a lot easier.

Better Security

ACCESS has more advanced encryption according to Frsky. Not a huge concern for hobbyists to be honest, but it’s a good thing nonetheless

I also have a feeling that this is a move to make it harder to reverse engineer their protocol, to stop 3rd parties making compatible receivers and transmitter modules that compete with Frsky.  For customers it’s not necessarily good news, as there will be fewer affordable options.

Backward Hardware Compatibility

As far as I know, ACCESS will be supported on some of the existing Frsky receivers, you would just have to flash a new firmware to support ACCESS. However you would have to purchase a new radio to use ACCESS, I don’t think older ACCST radios will support ACCESS.

You will need one of these radios Frsky recently released:

ACCESS firmware for receivers are already available for download on Frsky’s website, but only for five receivers at the time of publishing (May 2019): RXSR, RX6R, RX4R, G-RX6 and G-RX8.

For more info:

26 thoughts on “New Frsky Air Protocol – ACCESS

  1. Stashman

    Hoping Access becomes a more “mature” version of Accst, instead of the mess that has now corrupted FrSky.
    It may not be bad for a newer / beginner to the hobby, as they can grow with the Access system, but for the folks that made FrSky what they are. It really is kind of a mess at the moment.
    I’ve only been in the hobby for the last 2yrs, or so, and I’m one that I suppose will grow with the new Access protocol, as my previous experience was with my QX7 Accst and had only used the D8 protocol and the XM+ receiver. Now I’m advancing in the hobby and using the D16 protocol and Ive purchased a new X9D+ SE because I wanted a more advanced radio With more features and using Crossfire too, which just works on the X9D.
    Hoping FrSky knows what they’re doing? And in the meanwhile I continue in the FrSky community, until something moves me away… ✌🏼

  2. Carlos Catalan

    I can´t bind my tinyhawk freestyle 2 with my new taranis qx7 ACCESS. I have also just bought a multiprotocol module iRange x irx4 and still not binding yet

  3. Juan

    I am really upset with this B….. FrSky is now like an Iphone, either you buy new products or you get stuck. My old X9D plus is not able to work with a R9M access long range external module… of course not able to bind to an Access long range receiver either….. I am sorry but I will go back to a good Futaba radio.

  4. Vincent

    Hi, if I have ACCST QX7, ACESS R9M Module and R9MM RX. Can I use them together? Or I have to flash ACCST for R9M and ACCST for R9MM to work with my old TX?

  5. sean

    I have a qx7 with Access, how can i bind to the tinyhawk s with D8? i also tried the Accst D16 mode and that didnt work either.

  6. Nicolas

    Hi !
    Following a hard crash, my ACCST RXS-R receiver died. So I bought a new one but I received an ACCESS RXSR. My Taranis QX7 is ACCST mode. Consequently, I cannot bind my receiver to my transmitter.
    Here is my question:
    Is it possible to fly an ACCESS receiver with an ACCST transmitter (Taranis QX7) and how?

    Thank you guys, Oscar I really appreciate your work, very very helpful

  7. Nick Sebring

    I’d like to give the new FrSky Access protocol a shot, but, not at the epense of buying another radio to do so. If there’s no mod board in the works that I can open my QX7 and swap out a board with maybe some minor soldering, I’m out! FrSky, you need to reconsider!

  8. tello

    these people that complain about updating firmware are stupid.

    this is not unique to frsky. This applies to all hardware/software. upgrading the software to add new features, while still making it run on existing hardware typically means a firmware update.

    frsky is developing new protocols. they are better, and faster, but of course you need to update the firmware. any expectation that you would not have to, is ignorant.

  9. thibault berard

    agree …my taranis x9d+ just cost me more than 200 buck ( tara + m9 + protection) i hope i can get the acces without buy a new trasmetteur…or i will leave frsky

  10. Max

    Sorry but I can’t understand: may I use my old Taranis x9d plus with new accesss protocol? I flashed my x9d plus with OpenTx 2.3.1, R9M module to last access version and my r9mm to access firmware. But I just couldn’t bind receiver to the tx. I didn’t find “register rx”. I had have only “bind” option. And it didn’t bind. I rolled back my firmware to non access.

  11. Nick

    Annoyingly, it seems there will still be a separate EU version (how come only FrSky has this? Others seem to manage with just one).

    Benefits seem to split into convenience (non-contact binding, flashing etc), and performance (encryption, channels, latency etc). I am not bothered about the convenience aspects, so that just leaves the others. Not interested in better encryption, 16, let alone 24, channels is more than my need, and whilst others may feel latency has a real effect for them, it never has for me.

    So, for me, cannot see the benefit. Other other hand, the downsides: I use a QX7, don’t see that mentioned, where does it leave multi-protocol transmitters like Jumper T12/T16 (I saw some statement about 3rd parties, but I wonder), and it is more protocols to mismatch and confuse.

    To be honest, it seems more like a business ploy to lock people into FrSky and sell new gear, than any real consumer benefit.

  12. Phil Elliott

    I am thinking about selling all my frsky gear and going forward to futaba. It will cost me a few bob but the gear works flawlessly without upgrading firmware every time you want to use another feature. A real radio has pre programmed mixes too. If you are starting out it would be worth your time to look at the flysky paladin radio, it is very impressive.

  13. Alberto Scotti

    What is not clear to me is if a Tx equipped with an ACCESS Tx module will be able to communicate with older D or V series receivers. If not, I will stay with the old standard, which has been very reliable over time. I have several models equipped
    with D series and V series and do not want to convert to newer receivers…

  14. Padcom

    Well, it seems like the only benefit for me is that the ACCESS is capable of sending 24 channels – but only with special receivers because for example the XM module is not capable of doing so. Oh – maybe remapping channels would also be a nice to have (I use it on the CRSF hardware and it is very nice). Long story short I am not planning on upgrading to the new protocol ever. For more advanced features and lower latency I’ll stay with Crossfire.

  15. Snake675

    If frsky will not deliver updates to ACCESS protocoll for Taranis X9D and XSR, I probably would quit frsky! You cant be harsh to sellers and force them to decide between frsky and jumper and on the other hand force costumers to throw thier old stuff and buy a hole set of new ones.

  16. Rudi Venter

    You can go backwards and forwards with the firmware, just like you can change between FCC and EU firmware, no trap.

  17. Rudi Venter

    The statement that older TX’s and RX’s will support ACCESS in the future is in the announcement by FrSky.

  18. ched999uk

    Be careful updating ACCESS FW to existing receivers. Reason I say that is do you know you can go back to ACCST if you flash ACCESS? It may be a FRSky trap!!!!!

  19. Simon

    “First of all, I have no plan of reviewing the X9 Lite” – The very next article released on OscarLiang is the X9 Lite review!

    “As far as I know, ACCESS will be supported on most of the current Frsky receivers and transmitters” – Would love to hear this direct from Frsky as this is a definite benefit to the users of the current range of TX (QX7, X9D, X-Lite etc).


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

For prompt technical support, please use our forum I check blog comments weekly.